Sarah Fox, climate program manager for the Department of Commerce, said climate change has affected the state in many ways in recent years. The guidance helps cities and counties reduce their impact on the planet as well as improve their ability to withstand the harsher effects of climate change, she said.
“A more resilient city means you’re not suffering the effects of poor planning,” she said.
The new requirements came out of a controversial bill that passed the Legislature last session. Along with adding a climate element, the state’s 11 largest counties and the cities in those counties with populations greater than 6,000 people must update their transportation and land-use plans.
The bill passed 57-41 in the state House of Representatives and 29-20 in the state Senate.
During floor debates, Republicans argued that the policy would stifle growth and hinder housing construction.
“It adds bureaucracy, it slows us down, it adds cost, and it goes in absolutely the wrong direction for our state,” Senate Minority Leader John Braun, R-Centralia, said back in April.
But supporters said the proposal would help cities grow sustainably amid a changing environment. Sen. Liz Lovelett, D-Anacortes, said it was an opportunity to create “a meaningful blueprint” for the future that all residents deserve.
The greenhouse-gas emissions and resilience requirements can be met in a number of ways, and Commerce gives jurisdictions examples for how to incorporate them into their plans. These include things like reducing vehicle miles traveled, building denser housing near transit, expanding transit, developing more parks, and advancing environmental justice.
Fox said cities and counties have to provide an update in five years with any progress they’ve made toward implementing their climate plans, including any vehicle-miles-traveled goals. That will allow the state to see if voluntary targets set by local jurisdictions are working, and whether making those required at the state level would be a way to move forward.
Some counties already doing the work
Clark, Skagit, Thurston and Whatcom counties are the first counties to have to follow the requirement in 2025. The other counties will be gradually added over the years.
According to the Municipal Research and Services Center of Washington, most jurisdictions have some type of plan or document attempting to address emissions and climate issues.
Some have full climate action plans that include goals for emissions reductions and how to improve climate resilience. In the new guidance, Commerce pointed to Spokane, King and Thurston counties’ climate action plans as examples that other jurisdictions can follow.
Other counties, such as Benton, Franklin and Clark, have only documents, often hazard mitigation plans, that reference climate change and greenhouse-gas emissions. But these plans don’t necessarily include steps for addressing emissions or climate hazards. These counties will likely be starting from scratch in developing climate action plans in compliance with the new law.
Clark County is one of these.
Jenna Kay, from the county’s Community Planning Department, told the County Council last month that they may be able to use some of their existing policies to meet the new requirements. Councilors agreed that they wanted to be creative in how they comply and indicated that they wanted to use as few resources as possible. Still, Kay said creating the new element will take a lot of organization and coordination.
“This bill is cutting across a lot of topics and a lot of different pieces of the comprehensive plan,” she said.
For counties and cities that may need to do more work on their plans, Commerce is making grants available that jurisdictions could use to hire planners, contract workers, do outreach and more. About $30 million will be distributed over the next six years to help with this.
